Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Donna Reiner, PhD's avatar

I hope you do a follow up interview with some of the Repubs after the next election. I know that you have experience working at the polls as do I, but neither of us have worked the back end. It is interesting that Richer has lost "credibility" in part because he is friendly with Fontes. How immature/childish to think that.

Expand full comment
Morgan's avatar

It's true that even persuadable people are rarely convinced by facts recited by a less-than-trusted messenger. And it's tough for anyone to give up firmly held beliefs, and admit that they have been fooled. For those who can be persuaded, there needs to be a deeper, more emotional connection. Usually that's done by connecting to common values. As for dealing with imagined conspiracies, I think of Dr, Hotez's reasoning for not debating RFK Jr about vaccines: he said debating such people is like "trying to nail jello to the wall." As soon as you rebut some comment, another one pops up - there is an inexhaustible supply of evidence-free ideas that can be conjured up, and you can't continually work to disprove them all.

I don't mean that the efforts to acquaint the public with our election processes is fruitless - it is important, particularly for persuadable and curious people. But there probably will continue to be a significant number of people who will never believe that the system isn't out to get them.

Expand full comment
6 more comments...

No posts