Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Loretta's avatar

I've complained twice about the unsettling sexism and nostalgia in the "art," so today I must salute the efforts of the creepy little intern. Is that Kolodin at one end of the long table and Laura Terech at the other? She's a rising star for the Dems and was picked to present a Clean bill to show what the Christmas Tree bill of Kolodin and Rogers should have been. Focus, people; focus.

Expand full comment
Gettaway Gal's avatar

I follow border security issues closely and, while there seem to be some funding and process improvements in the Senate draft, I think most of us “outside the bubble” have to wonder why it does not more directly address the estimated 11M +/- illegal immigrants in the U.S. In particular, why not provide for an immediate and continuing shutdown (excepting only the humanitarian allowances and included in the draft) while the appropriate agencies round up and adjudicate/deport some minimum number of those already here - say, 5M - and, only when that process is successfully implemented, re-open? Put another way, I am guessing most of us realize there’s no hope of discouraging future waves of illegal immigration if there are no meaningful consequences for those who have already “cut the line” and, to the same end, are highly skeptical that the current administration (which deliberately opened the the floodgates the moment they took off office) will actually do anything meaningful on this front. I would add that, personally, I favor legalizing the dreamers and, as the first person in my mother’s family born in the US (after my grandparents, fleeing dire oppression, were refused admission in the 1920s and had to go elsewhere), also favor greatly liberalizing our work rules and immigration numbers (with an emphasis on the skill sets we need).

Expand full comment
5 more comments...

No posts

Ready for more?