In just a few weeks, it will be a half-century since a car bomb tore Arizona Republic reporter Don Bolles apart outside the Clarendon Hotel, resulting in the now-legendary Phoenix journalist’s death 11 days later.
It’s a story that not many outside of the journalism world know.
But a new book — released last week and written by one of our Capitol press corps colleagues — sets out to finally compile the messy facts of the still-mysterious murder into one neat bundle. But as author and Axios reporter Jeremy Duda will tell you, the conclusions of his hard-boiled whodunnit are far from tidy. (You can order your copy here.)
Duda’s second book, “Murder in the Fourth Estate,” reflects the fact that to this day, a thick fog of mystery surrounds the bombing and who ordered it.
After his assassination, Bolles became a household name in Arizona and among reporters across the United States. Journalists from the newly-formed Investigative Reports and Editors organization parachuted into Phoenix to finish whatever work it was assumed cost Bolles his life, though it was never clear what exactly that was.
Seven years of trials and retrials resulted in the convictions of three men: John Adamson, Jimmy “The Plumber” Robison and Max Dunlap. But suspicions that someone more powerful might have been involved — like rancher and liquor wholesaling king Kemper Marley or shady dog racing scion Bradley Funk — remained suspicions.
Duda says it wasn’t necessarily his goal to change that perception.
“The purpose of this project was never to prove who did or didn’t kill Bolles, or to convince people that one theory or another was correct; it was to write the comprehensive account that this historically significant case deserved,” Duda writes in the epilogue. “I’ve tried to include as much information as I can, from all sides of the case, so readers can reach their own conclusions.”
After reading the book, we can tell you that it doesn’t uncover an earth-shattering revelation that connects any of the suspected powerful interests to the murder.
Duda ends the book with his own opinion — separate from the work of the fact-based narrative — in which he states that it doesn’t seem likely Marley was involved.
Nor was there enough evidence to point to Funk, whose business dealings with the mafia-adjacent Emprise Corporation Bolles tried to expose. Funk reportedly held a personal vendetta because Bolles assisted Funk’s ex-wife with investigative work during Funk’s divorce proceedings; the Phoenix New Times even ran a story about him in 1976 titled, “He was the perfect suspect… and the cops ignored him.”
What the book does provide is a rigorously researched, fact-based dossier of what is known — and a snapshot of Phoenix in the 1970s, when it was still transforming from a small farming community to the sprawling, air-conditioned megalopolis it is today. The city that Bolles documented was a Wild West outpost colliding with the opportunism of the postwar economic boom, rife with big business interests, mafiosos, land fraud and rumors of political corruption. At the heart of the book are a shady cast of characters, from lawyers and business elite to hard-drinking, low-life crooks.
And yep, it’s the first time anyone has pulled all these sources together — making it an exciting read for anyone (especially our fellow journalists) who have heard Bolles’ name lionized but aren’t familiar with the details of the drawn-out investigation into his murder.
And the story of Bolles is as relevant as ever today. In the past few years, Arizona lawmakers from both sides of the aisle have introduced a bill — which our very own Hank conceived of in 2023 — to honor Bolles with a statue at the Capitol, which would be paid for by private funds.
It’s the subject of the lone TikTok (which is absolutely worth a watch) we’ve ever made.
@arizona.agenda There is a monument to fake news at the Arizona Capitol. We want to put up a monument to a real newspaper hero. For daily Arizona politic... See more
But year after year, the project has been stonewalled by Republican Sen. Jake Hoffman, the chair of the Senate Government Committee (and also a fake elector and professional troll farmer).
This year’s bill, sponsored by Republican Rep. Selina Bliss, passed the House and is now sitting at Hoffman’s desk, where HB2079 is likely to die yet again. That’s because Hoffman, after years of outright ignoring the Bolles monument, has decided to use it as a sort of bargaining chip to rename the park plaza across from the Capitol after his late friend, Turning Point USA founder Charlie Kirk. He introduced a bill, SB1686, tying honoring Kirk to the Bolles monument, which Bolles’ son said was “sad” for him to hear.
“(Don Bolles) was from the (Walter) Cronkite days, where the news is the news, you don’t go proselytizing for other causes,” David Bolles told us. “That was his take on things — not to create heroes out of people that probably more than half the United States doesn’t feel should be treated as a hero.”
Hoffman’s bill passed the Senate and the House Government Committee. It’s currently sitting with Speaker of the House Steve Montenegro awaiting a final vote in the House.
If anything else, that makes it as good a time as any to get yourself a copy of Duda’s book, revisit the tale of Bolles and understand why we should honor a man whose unrelenting pursuit of the truth — even after he was taken off the investigative beat at the Republic — put him in the way of danger.
Bolles knew that and it never swayed him.
As Duda writes:
“Bolles predicted that, if he was killed, it would be with a bomb, joking that if he was blown apart, they should ‘save what’s left for the chili.’”

Putting on a show: President Donald Trump warmed the hearts of several Arizona officials who are on the ballot this year, like Senate President Warren Petersen, when he name dropped them during Friday’s “Build the Red Wall” event in Phoenix. Trump also pantomimed blowing up boats in the Caribbean Sea and made wild promises about the Iran war and releasing UFO files, while Republican U.S. Rep. Paul Gosar’s performance at the rally raised more concerns about his health.
A win for MAGA: A judge handed election-skeptic and Maricopa County Recorder Justin Heap a legal victory on Friday. Heap and the Board of Supervisors have been locked in a dispute over who does what with county elections. Superior Court Judge Scott Blaney said the Board of Supervisors is rightfully in charge of the county budget, but the supervisors improperly took away computer specialists from the Recorder’s Office, the Republic’s Ronald J. Hansen reports. Republican Supervisor Kate Brophy McGee said she might appeal, which prompted Republican Sen. Jake Hoffman to call her a “complete & total PUPPET” and a “bad person.”
Pushing him toward the door: After a poll showed Republican U.S. Rep. David Schweikert was way behind Republican U.S. Rep. Andy Biggs in the GOP primary for governor, and campaign finance reports showed Schweikert was nearly out of money, Petersen called for Schweikert to drop out of the race. Both GOP candidates trail Democratic Gov. Katie Hobbs by a wide margin. She’s sitting on $7.2 million, while Biggs has about $1.1 million and Schweikert has $86,000, the Arizona Mirror’s Jim Small reports.
Won’t need the pension either way: Democratic U.S. Sen. Mark Kelly is calling for military brass to stop trying to strip him of his retirement rank and pay for the “illegal orders” video he and five other lawmakers put out in November, States Newsroom reports. Incidentally, that video and the ensuing publicity helped Kelly rake in $13 million in campaign funds, leaving him with more than $22 million in cash on hand, even though he’s not up for reelection this year, per Politico.
We are once again asking you to stop giving money to politicians. You’ll get a much bigger bang for your buck by supporting local journalism.
Placing an awfully big bet: Republican Rep. David Marshall announced he was resigning from the Legislature on Friday, after the Navajo County Board of Supervisors appointed him county recorder. But Marshall is legally barred from holding the recorder job, Wayne Schutsky reports for KJZZ. The problem comes from the wording of the state Constitution, which says state lawmakers can’t hold other state or county offices “during the term for which he shall have been elected.” His term as a lawmaker doesn’t end until next January.
In other, other news
Democratic U.S. Sen. Ruben Gallego is trying to downplay claims from a Florida Republican congresswoman who says she has salacious details of sexual misconduct (David Iversen / KTAR) … The backers of a pair of ballot measures designed to rein in Arizona’s school voucher program raised a combined $5.9 million (Howard Fischer / Capitol Media Services) … The Arizona Attorney General’s Office investigator who shot and killed a woman on his doorstep may have been justified (Jose R. Gonzalez / Republic) … Republican Rep. Tony Rivero wants committee chairs to be able to order the arrest of anyone who doesn’t show up when lawmakers ask them to (Caitlin Sievers / Arizona Mirror).

Debates season is right around the corner!
As we prepare to grill the candidates as part of the Arizona Citizens Clean Elections Commission legislative debate series, we want to know what issues matter most to you.
Sure, we know you care about issues like education, elections, water, the border, infrastructure and the environment.
But those are pretty broad.
So this week, we’re asking you to help us narrow it down a bit by filling out some simple surveys. Today’s “What’s Your Issue” is about social services.
Think of it this way: If we can only ask candidates about one of the subtopics on this list, what should it be?
When it comes to social services

Democratic U.S. Rep. Adelita Grijalva uttered words we never thought we’d hear during a congressional hearing: “You apparently once cut the penis off a roadkill raccoon.”
But we probably shouldn’t have been surprised, given that she was talking to U.S. Secretary of Health and Human Services Robert F. Kennedy, Jr.
RFK Jr reportedly cut off the raccoon penis while on a family vacation so he could study it later, which was why Grijalva brought it up in the first place.
The nation’s top purveyor of bonkers medical ideas likes to do his own research, but Grijalva urged him to let the professionals do it, instead of trying to cut funding to the National Institutes of Health.

