The Legislature’s budgeting process under Gov. Katie Hobbs has been turbulent, quickly swinging from surplus-fueled slush funds to deficit-driven cuts.
But amid the political infighting, shutdown warnings and intraparty betrayals, lawmakers have still managed to pass a state spending plan every year.
And despite the current standoff, history suggests Arizona will probably get one this year, too.
Just not before the Capitol wrings every possible ounce of drama from the process.
This season’s plot already has the theatrics: the governor walking away from negotiations, Republican lawmakers leaving town after sending Hobbs a plan they knew she wouldn’t sign and a looming June 30 deadline to fund state government.
Behind-the-scenes budget talks only recently resumed.
The big unresolved issues are the same ones that blew up negotiations in March: whether voters will get a chance to renew Prop. 123, the roughly $300 million-a-year education funding stream that expired last year, and whether Arizona will fully adopt President Donald Trump’s tax cuts — and what the state will cut to pay for them.
Hobbs left budget talks after Republicans refused to budge on referring Prop. 123 to the ballot. Her condition for returning was a public explanation of how Republicans planned to pay for tax conformity.
The GOP’s now-vetoed budget gave the answer: across-the-board cuts to state agencies, fund sweeps and reductions to social services.
Already, this year’s budget season is borrowing a lot from past episodes.
So while our lawmakers take a midseason break, we’re gonna catch you up on each year’s budget drama under our divided government so far.
And in honor of the drama with which lawmakers handle our tax money, we’re doing it in soap-opera style.
Previously on “The Young and the Budgetless” …
2023: The betrayal

The Young and the Restless, CBS
The first season opened with a new ruler in the executive tower and a Republican legislative majority still mourning the reign of Doug Ducey.
Then, Hobbs released her first executive budget proposal. The Capitol’s Republicans collectively gasped.
Hobbs had proposed rolling back one of the GOP’s crown jewels of the Ducey era: universal school vouchers.
Republicans warned that Hobbs’ first-ever executive budget proposal could bring state government to the brink of a shutdown. Rep. David Livingston sounded the alarm: How was the state supposed to prepare for possible layoffs by July 1?
So the GOP moved fast with a “skinny budget,” a bare-bones continuation of the spending plan Ducey had already signed the year before. This would be the new budget approach under Hobbs’ reign, leaders declared: pass the basics first, then fight over the extras later.
It was a doomed act of political bravery. Republicans knew Hobbs wouldn’t sign the plan — she had already said as much. They passed it anyway.
Once the skinny budget met its predictable demise, lawmakers moved on to the fuller-figured version: a budget bulked up by one-time surplus cash. GOP lawmakers secured money for their districts — just enough to convince them to vote for the budget.
Hobbs got her first budget deal.
Republicans got hometown wins and preserved their voucher crown jewel in the process.
But Democrats were left watching from the wings, wondering why they hadn’t been written into the happy ending.
2024: The deficit disaster

The Young and the Restless, CBS
The surplus romance was over.
Thanks to our leaders’ largess, Arizona was suddenly staring into a roughly $2 billion budget hole. The Legislature’s financial experts delivered the heartbreaking news that income tax collections had fallen sharply from the year before.
One of the Ducey era’s other crown jewels, the flat income tax, was no longer sparkling quite so brightly. Instead, it was helping drain the state coffers.
Lawmakers spent months fighting their way through a drawn-out session, complete with “shame” chants and plenty of intraparty sniping.
By June, Hobbs and Republican leaders finally struck a deal.
It was not a good sign for state government.
The budget cuts came for water conservation, roads and universities.
Then came the final twist of the knife: $155 million in opioid settlement funds swept into the prison budget.
Just when Hobbs thought the chaos was over, a betrayal emerged from her own party: Attorney General Kris Mayes blasted the opioid sweep as an “egregious grab.”
Hobbs signed the budget anyway, effectively blessing the reduced-government era that Arizona’s deficit had forced.
Mayes sued to stop the sweep of opioid funds, a tranche of dollars her office distributes.
But she eventually dropped the case.
2025: The governor’s revenge

The Young and the Restless, CBS
The money returned last year, but peace did not.
Hobbs opened the session with a long list of promises, including another shot at Republicans’ favorite family heirloom: universal school vouchers.
The program was a “billion-dollar boondoggle,” she said, though her first two budgets had failed to meaningfully reform it.
And as voucher costs climbed toward the $1 billion mark, Hobbs saw a hypocrisy ripe for daytime television: Republicans were willing to spend big subsidizing private education, but not immediately willing to cover a $122 million shortfall in a Division of Developmental Disabilities program for children with disabilities.
So Hobbs decided to stop messing around.
She would veto every bill that landed on her desk, she announced, until Republicans agreed to fund the program.
House Speaker Steve Montenegro called it “political blackmail.”
Livingston, the House’s budget expert, was irate. Hobbs, he said in a dramatic floor speech, should negotiate with Republicans or “sit up in her ivory tower ... and drink her wine and not worry about it.”
After weeks of brinkmanship, Republicans relented and funded the Division of Developmental Disabilities program. But the drama was not over.
Lawmakers took sporadic, week-long breaks from the Capitol while the negotiators in charge hammered out the budget behind closed doors. After all that time away, they returned to finally end the session by voting on the deal leadership had spent weeks brokering.
But House Republicans had spent their time off preparing a twist ending: They unveiled their own budget plan, written without the governor’s blessing.
Across the Capitol plaza, Senate Republicans refused to entertain the theatrics and embraced a governor-negotiated budget.
Senate President Warren Petersen withstood vile RINO accusations, but Montenegro clung to his beloved budget plan as the shutdown clock ticked louder.
After a second failed attempt at a House-only budget, Montenegro finally relented.
Hobbs signed a budget that secured many of her own priorities.
For one fleeting moment, the governor had won.
But 2026 was already waiting, this time, with what could be her final budget fight.
How will season four end? Vote below.

The Young and the Restless, CBS
The 2026 budget: How will it end?

Best job in town: Taxpayers are going to pay state lawmakers $178,000 over the next few weeks, even though lawmakers decided to take a month-long break, the Arizona Mirror’s Caitlin Sievers calculates. The Arizona House’s policy is to pay lawmakers a per diem for every day of the legislative session, which can add up quickly. Lawmakers who don’t live in Maricopa County collect $269 per day up until the 120th day of the session, which is this Friday. After that, they’ll get $135 per day.
A yearlong subscription to the Agenda costs less than one lawmaker’s daily food allowance.
Before Yellowstone was cool: Since there’s not much happening at the Legislature right now, the Capitol Times’ Jordan Gerard addressed one of the lingering questions at the Capitol: What’s up with Sen. TJ Shope’s cowboy hat? It turns out the hat Shope has worn for more than a decade is made from pure beaver leather and he’s never lost it, thanks to a holder he set up inside his truck.
Classified as public: Democratic U.S. Sen. Mark Kelly and Secretary of Defense Pete Hegseth are still going at it. The latest round involves Kelly talking about the military burning through weapons stockpiles for the war on Iran, which Hegseth said on social media was from a classified briefing. Kelly reminded him that they discussed it at a public hearing last week, the Republic’s Ronald J. Hansen writes.
“That’s not classified, it’s a quote from you,” Kelly said.
And then there were 14: Maricopa County health officials say they’ve found 14 cases of the measles so far this year, nearly all of which were from unvaccinated people, the New Times’ Zach Buchanan reports. The tally has doubled in the last month, reaching the highest total since at least 2006.
Literally the Wild West: A criminal syndicate out of California is robbing trains and cargo trucks in remote areas of Arizona, KTAR’s Colton Krolak reports. The Yavapai County Sheriff’s Office says the robbers know exactly where and when trains will slow down or stop, which makes for the perfect time to strike.
Good luck, Jamaica: President Donald Trump nominated Kari Lake, the two-time failed candidate in denial, as the U.S. ambassador to Jamaica, per a White House press release. She’ll still need Senate confirmation to actually serve. The move comes after Lake was never confirmed as the head of the U.S. Agency for Global Media and Voice of America — a role that a judge ruled she illegally held until she was forced into an advisor role.
The best lede of the day: The New Times’ Stephen Lemons kicked off his story about the “most ghoulish” things he saw at Border Security Expo with the funniest imagery in today’s news. He described the government officials and tech company executives gathered together “like a litter of kitties around a milk bowl.”

Well, that was awkward.
Amish Shah went on Brahm Resnik’s “Sunday Square Off” to talk about the Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee backing Marlene Galán-Woods, instead of Shah, in Arizona’s 1st Congressional District.
The DCCC endorsing Galán-Woods was a pretty surprising turn of events, considering Shah is the only previous nominee the organization passed over in favor of a fresh face — perhaps because Shah trailed behind Kamala Harris in the district.
As Resnik noted, that interview got off to a bit of a rocky start.
Resnik: Welcome back to Square Off, sir.
Shah: You’ve never actually had me on the show. I’ve been on Dennis Welch (a reporter with Resnik’s rival network), you know this?
Resnik: Who?
Shah: Maybe you’ve heard of him.
Resnik: Some guy? Ok.
Shah: He has a nicer set, I’ll tell you that much.
Resnik: Well, we’re off to a great start here today. Welcome to “Square Off” for the first time.
Shah: I haven’t seen you since I saw you on the street next to my house.
Also, the Agenda’s coverage of Shah’s decision to vote in the 2016 GOP Presidential Preference Election — almost certainly for Donald Trump — made an appearance.
As we noted at the time, both Shah and his campaign suspiciously refused to confirm or deny reports from several Democratic sources that Shah had bragged that he had supported Trump in the 2016 primary because he thought Trump would be the weakest GOP nominee. That’s called “crossover voting,” or temporarily shifting parties to cast a ballot in a rival party’s primary as a strategic way to pick a weaker candidate for the opposition.
“Dr. Shah does not believe that any American should have to reveal their personal voting choices. This is America, not Soviet Russia,” his spokeswoman told us two years ago.
On Resnik’s show, Shah said the idea that he voted for Trump was “absolutely misinformation — I voted for Hillary Clinton, I voted for Joe Biden, I voted for Kamala Harris.”
Both things can be true — that he voted for Trump in the primary, then voted for Clinton in November.
And for the record, his voting record shows he absolutely voted for a Republican in the 2016 Presidential Preference Election.
We can’t say with certainty who he voted for in the GOP primary.
But the fact that he’s still trying to spin this tale tells you a lot.
