Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Morgan's avatar

About the bill to outlaw AI for various election purposes: there is a deeper problem with it (SB1360) than the one stated here. Ai has become an extremely broad term, potentially covering software approaches that are used nearly everywhere, such as for autocomplete in writing. In elections, tabulators need to determine when they can't determine the voter's intent. This is an automatic decision process that could be called AI these days (AI originally [in the 1950s] referred to a set of rules to mimic human behavior, and now refers to mathematical algorithms that are trained to get a desired result). The term is so general that it now covers many things that we all depend on; it's not just Chat GPT (and it's certainly not SkyNet). Last year I gave testimony to the House committee considering this Senate bill. since I worked in this area for 40 years; they listened politely and then voted in favor of it anyway. Gov. Hobbs vetoed it, and hopefully she will again if it makes it through.

Expand full comment
mike miller's avatar

The article about saguaros on the border. The sentence reads " but the report says at least have didn’t survive the move, per KJZZ’s Tori Gantz. " Should be half instead of have. I enjoy the Arizona Agenda every day. Thanks for doing it.

Expand full comment
2 more comments...

No posts

Ready for more?