Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Desert Rat's avatar

The media fascination with Foxx mirrors their belief that Sen. Gallego won on the strengths of his talents rather than a profound hostility to his opponent.

Expand full comment
bisbeefred's avatar

Ummm, you may be looking at this upside down. If a candidate with Grijalva's name, organization, deep pockets, and history in the district didn't win by a ton, something would be drastically wrong. If she is as strong as perceived, she should have won by 75% or more. The salient fact is that an unknown woman running her first campaign that was different and very sophisticated, raised a lot of money from small donors, and received 20% of the vote in a shortened election period. I'm not sure having no 'guvment' experience is a bad thing-given what we see going on in DC. She beat Daniel Hernandez who had raised almost twice as much money. (and his two sisters who hopefully will face candidates themselves next year! The Hernandez family illustrates much that is wrong with the democratic party.) Maybe take a closer look at this race and in a couple weeks when the stats are in, revisit your conclusions.

Expand full comment
5 more comments...

No posts

Ready for more?