For CD1, Democrat Amish Shah is also running (unless he has dropped out), and the FEC shows him as having received 554K up to now and having 368K on hand. Note: this is not an endorsement of Shah - at this point at least, I'm neutral in the primary. (See https://www.fec.gov/data/elections/house/AZ/01/2024/ for the information).
You're totally right . A few people flagged that I forgot ole Dr. Shah. My bad all! Added, with a correction. Will add a correction in the Wednesday email too.
The state allows a foreign company to buy unknown quantities of cheap water and the Navajo Nation is begging the Feds to complete a promised pipe line so their people have water. Am I living in upside down land?
Hank, I do this political stuff for a living. Rachel and I met during the Pinal election atrocity last August. My pub is www.sbinsider.org and we had the story July 1st.
Great articles as usual. A few notes . . . I didn't know Tom Horne had those issues. Still shocked he somehow got back in the game after his former terrible performance.
Also happy that Kris Mayes is going to do something about the Saudi water issue! Yaay
Kris Mayes-Our Lawyer, the People's Lawyer, ROCKS IT. Love her and am so grateful to and for her. The best one in the Hubbs Administration. Can someone clone her, please?!
It's because No Labels is an actual party (at least in Arizona) with a platform of centrism. "Independents" are actually known as "No Party Designated" because they do not have a party or a unifying platform other than they are neither Republican, Democrat, No Labels, Libertarian or Green (which isn't a party here anymore anyway)
For CD1, Democrat Amish Shah is also running (unless he has dropped out), and the FEC shows him as having received 554K up to now and having 368K on hand. Note: this is not an endorsement of Shah - at this point at least, I'm neutral in the primary. (See https://www.fec.gov/data/elections/house/AZ/01/2024/ for the information).
You're totally right . A few people flagged that I forgot ole Dr. Shah. My bad all! Added, with a correction. Will add a correction in the Wednesday email too.
Oops, the first sentence still says "four candidates ..."
The state allows a foreign company to buy unknown quantities of cheap water and the Navajo Nation is begging the Feds to complete a promised pipe line so their people have water. Am I living in upside down land?
Sure seems so!
I read that Jack O’Donnell has dropped out of the race due to a visit from Democrat establishment
You're right! Where'd you see that? I hadn't read anything. I just heard it from Engel's people today.
Hank, I do this political stuff for a living. Rachel and I met during the Pinal election atrocity last August. My pub is www.sbinsider.org and we had the story July 1st.
Published July 1st https://sbinsider.org/congressman-ciscomani-serves-a-political-breakfast-in-saddlebrooke/
Great articles as usual. A few notes . . . I didn't know Tom Horne had those issues. Still shocked he somehow got back in the game after his former terrible performance.
Also happy that Kris Mayes is going to do something about the Saudi water issue! Yaay
Here's a fun archive for you.
https://arizonaagenda.substack.com/p/the-daily-agenda-does-nobody-remember
Kris Mayes-Our Lawyer, the People's Lawyer, ROCKS IT. Love her and am so grateful to and for her. The best one in the Hubbs Administration. Can someone clone her, please?!
I don’t understand why Independents and No Labels aren’t the same thing. What policy differences are there?
It's because No Labels is an actual party (at least in Arizona) with a platform of centrism. "Independents" are actually known as "No Party Designated" because they do not have a party or a unifying platform other than they are neither Republican, Democrat, No Labels, Libertarian or Green (which isn't a party here anymore anyway)
As always, Neal, a great editorial. You rock. (And roll, as in, roll over the bad guys!) Keep it up!