Ducey canceled federal unemployment benefits and promised back-to-work bonuses instead. He’s only paid 222 of them.
Four months after Ducey announced $300 million in "return-to-work bonuses," the state is still sitting on more than $299.5 million.
When Gov. Doug Ducey announced in May that he was cutting Arizonans off from the federal government’s additional $300 per week in pandemic-related unemployment insurance, he promised a sweeping new program that would provide “return-to-work bonuses,” child care subsidies and education scholarships to incentivize people to get jobs.
But four months after Ducey announced the program, and more than two months after he cut off additional federal unemployment benefits, only 222 people have received a bonus for pulling themselves up by their bootstraps.
The state so far has doled out $422,000 in bonuses for people who got a job and got off unemployment, according to the Arizona Department of Economic Security, which is charged with administering the fund.
That’s less than 0.15% of the $300 million Ducey promised for the program. And it’s far less than the federal benefits would have paid out to needy Arizonans struggling through a worldwide pandemic that has stunted the economy, infected more than a million Arizonans and killed nearly 20,000.
The program came with an eye-popping price tag: Besides the $300 million for return-to-work bonuses ($1,000 for finding part-time work or $2,000 for full-time work) Ducey pledged nearly $14 million for community college scholarships and GED programs; and promised to pay three months of free childcare to any parents who qualified for the new program.
The Department of Economic Security had slightly more success delivering the promised child care subsidies — 740 of those were approved before the application period ended. But it hasn’t handed out any community college scholarships — the website says more information about that program is “coming soon.”
The cutoff to get a job passed last week, meaning while some people who have already found a job can still apply to receive a bonus, nobody who starts a new job from here on out will be eligible.
The Department of Economic Security is still hopeful that now that the window for getting a new job has elapsed, applications for the bonuses and other services will pick up in the coming weeks. And there’s another reason for the slow payments — new hires need to show that they have worked 10 consecutive weeks in order to qualify for the bonus.
Still, a mere 5,500 people have even applied for a bonus (most of them still need to submit their 10 consecutive weeks of pay stubs to claim their bonus). In addition, DES said, there are nearly 19,000 applications in progress that have not yet been completed.
Nearly a quarter-million Arizonans were receiving unemployment benefits during the weeks of May 8 or May 15, the key timeframe during which people had to be on unemployment to qualify for the bonus if they went back to work full- or part-time.
If you’re new to the Arizona Agenda, check out our About page to learn more about what we’re doing. And if you like what you’re reading, sign up to get our emails in your inbox.
At this rate, Ducey’s return-to-work program will never spend the $300 million that he pledged — that’s enough money to pay out bonuses between 150,000 and 300,000 Arizonans.
DES said it has tried to contact most of the people who would be eligible for a return-to-work bonus, but people are simply not taking advantage of the program.
When he announced the return-to-work bonuses, Ducey, his staff and his allies lauded the program as comprehensive and groundbreaking.
“In Arizona, we’re gonna use federal money to get people back to work, instead of paying people not to work,” Ducey said in a video announcing both the unemployment cuts and the new program.
“@dougducey has put together the most sound back to work policies in the country! Watch for many other states to follow this lead,” his spokesman tweeted.
Democrats argued Ducey was cutting off real money flowing into the pockets of people who desperately needed it to survive the pandemic. But chambers of commerce around the state praised the governor’s market-oriented solution. The program would simply shift those funds into the pockets of those who want to get back to work, the rational went.
It hasn’t worked out that way — at least not yet.
Ducey’s spokesman C.J. Karamargin said it’s far too early to determine if the program is a success or failure — DES will continue to accept applications for the bonuses through Nov. 15, and the number of applications could skyrocket in the next two months.
“Maybe the numbers will stay where they are. Maybe there will be a last minute rush. But that is yet to be seen, but I think it's premature to call it a failure,” he said.
More broadly, he said the goal of the program was never to hand out government funds in the form of a back-to-work bonus — it was to get people back to work. That’s happened, he said, noting that the state just announced it had recovered 100% of the jobs lost since April 2020.
“The overall goal of this incentive program is to essentially grease the wheels so people can get back into the workforce,” he said. “And people seem to be doing that without this incentive, anyway. And from our perspective, that's a good thing.”
He declined to say what will happen to the $300 million if Ducey doesn’t spend it on back-to-work bonuses, saying they’ll cross that bridge when and if they come to it.
We don’t have $300 million sitting around — we rely on your paid subscriptions to keep us in business. If you want to support independent local journalism, you can throw us $7 per month.
Many who applied have been denied, sometimes because of what seems like problems in the massively underfunded and crumbling unemployment insurance system.
John Bower, a 26-year-old Democratic organizer, was working for the Outlaw Dirty Money campaign in March 2020 when the pandemic hit. The campaign folded, saying the pandemic made it impossible to gather the signatures necessary to put an issue on the ballot. Bower suddenly found himself out of work.
He’s found short-term political gigs in the last year and has left the unemployment rolls multiple times. But finding steady work has been near impossible.
“I’m just an honest guy trying to make an honest living and trying to support myself. And I’d never been on welfare before. I didn’t know how the system worked. Believe it or not, I worked for all these Democrats and I had never once been on welfare,” he chuckled.
Applying for unemployment was its own mess.
Then, in mid-May, after receiving unemployment on and off for nearly a year, he received a notice of ineligibility and lost his benefits for the key timeframe during which a person must have been on the unemployment rolls to receive a bonus. He was unemployed at the time and started receiving the unemployment benefits again shortly after, he said.
After dozens of phone calls to DES, he filed for a waiver and appealed the decision to cut his benefits for those weeks. But even if he wins his case, he’s not sure if it’ll happen in time to apply for a bonus.
These days, he’s holding two part-time jobs — not in politics, but at local restaurants. It’s enough to get by, barely, but he was really counting on that return-to-work bonus. That’s money that he needs to cover rent and feed himself and his dog.
“To me, it just feels like they don't want to give us that money,” he said. “The year was dramatic enough. And this was just a nightmare. It ruined me for a while, you know, I was really, really depressed and really worried about how I was going to pay rent.”
Tell your friends about the Arizona Agenda so they can get our reporting in their inboxes.
UPDATE ON UNEMPLOYED WORKERS UNITED v. DUCEY
From the attorneys on the case
As you know, a lawsuit was filed last week on behalf of Unemployed Workers United and the nearly 100,000 unemployed workers in Arizona receiving pandemic-related unemployment benefits, alleging that Gov. Ducey and the Director of DES unlawfully refused to accept and pass on the $300 weekly Federal Pandemic Unemployment Compensation (FPUC) benefit for nine weeks from July 10, 2021, to the week beginning on September 6, 2021 (up to $2,700 per person). Arizona law requires the state to “Take such action as may be necessary to secure to this state and its citizens all advantages…that relate to unemployment compensation…” A.R.S. § 23-645 (“State-Federal Cooperation”). The lawsuit claims that “all” means “all” and by turning down these FPUC benefits completely paid for by the federal government, Gov. Ducey and the DES Director violated Arizona law and, ineffectively changing this law, violated the Arizona Constitution’s separation of powers principle by unlawfully taking power that belongs to the Legislature.
Today, we are filing a motion for a preliminary injunction and we are requesting an expedited hearing on the matter because the end of the CDC’s eviction moratorium coinciding with the end of the pandemic-related unemployment benefits has created a crisis for many Arizonans who should have received the FPUC benefits. To the extent that state officials have claimed that the lawsuit is too late since the program has ended, we just learned that on September 3, 2021, the U.S. Department of Labor (DOL), which oversees the contracts with the states to provide these benefits, issued guidance to all fifty states (including Arizona) on how states that canceled benefits can go about retroactively reinstating those benefits. There is an urgency to doing this, however, as the DOL has set October 6, 2021, as a deadline for reinstatement of these federal benefits.
We are aware that some individuals have spoken negatively about this lawsuit. Any time there is a legal action affecting so many people, there will be people with different opinions and everyone is entitled to their opinion. However, this lawsuit filed by Unemployed Workers United and three individual unemployed workers is the only lawsuit that has been filed on this issue and, therefore, the only opportunity for Arizonans who unfairly lost these benefits to recover them. Of course, there is always the chance a court will disagree with us about how to interpret the law and there is no guarantee of a win, but if the court interprets the law as written, finding that “all” means “all”, we strongly believe this lawsuit should be successful. Gov. Ducey himself is a “strict constructionist” meaning he believes the courts should interpret laws as they are written. In any case, it makes sense to us to continue to fight for these federal benefits for so many Arizonans who need them and which come at no cost to the state of Arizona. As you fight for your rights through Unemployed Workers United, we will continue to fight in the courts and will keep you up to date on what is happening with the lawsuit through UWU. Dominick Corey and team with We The People, For The People United! We have a Facebook group! https://www.facebook.com/groups/azpul2.0
Sheila Maddali and Chris Williams, National Legal Advocacy Network