I wish journalists didn't use "controversial" to describe "attempts to remove rights from groups of people" and it disappoints me every time. You are helping to legitimize me losing my health care due to my gender. That's not controversial. Also I wish every news link on Charlie Kirk would include links to every word he said about gun violence in the US as context but I know nobody will. Just sad and angry that the cult I grew up in and escaped is now in charge of my country and nobody will challenge it without softening every word.
If money is free speech as decided by SCOTUS in Citizens United why don’t they want us to know who is speaking? Makes no sense to me. I have to disclose the money I’ve donated to a candidate (I’ve never given nearly $5000) no one has ever come knockin’ or shooting. Gun violence is never acceptable. Mr.Kirk’s murder is a travesty but to blame it on speech by the opposing party is also never acceptable especially when the shooter has still not been captured. When Melissa Hortman and her husband were murdered in their home by a man posing as a policeman we got crickets from the White House. (There was the usual thought and prayers, so over used) No nation wide flags at half staff, she was a Democrat. Not only money is speech. If you say it own it.
Isn't it convenient that the Goldwater Institute now believes in a right to privacy? I thought originalist conservatives didn't believe in rights not explicitly listed in the Constitution.
I wish journalists didn't use "controversial" to describe "attempts to remove rights from groups of people" and it disappoints me every time. You are helping to legitimize me losing my health care due to my gender. That's not controversial. Also I wish every news link on Charlie Kirk would include links to every word he said about gun violence in the US as context but I know nobody will. Just sad and angry that the cult I grew up in and escaped is now in charge of my country and nobody will challenge it without softening every word.
If money is free speech as decided by SCOTUS in Citizens United why don’t they want us to know who is speaking? Makes no sense to me. I have to disclose the money I’ve donated to a candidate (I’ve never given nearly $5000) no one has ever come knockin’ or shooting. Gun violence is never acceptable. Mr.Kirk’s murder is a travesty but to blame it on speech by the opposing party is also never acceptable especially when the shooter has still not been captured. When Melissa Hortman and her husband were murdered in their home by a man posing as a policeman we got crickets from the White House. (There was the usual thought and prayers, so over used) No nation wide flags at half staff, she was a Democrat. Not only money is speech. If you say it own it.
Melissa Hortman was the Representative from the Minnesota Legislature.
Isn't it convenient that the Goldwater Institute now believes in a right to privacy? I thought originalist conservatives didn't believe in rights not explicitly listed in the Constitution.
How come the GI doesn't believe in the right to privacy when it comes to abortion, sexual orientation and more?